Those that participate in GvG are there daily and it's constantly brought up by players as something they're passionate about. I'm just guessing here, but it's possible the impact of GvG is a lot more obvious than that of Guild Forum. WHERE I would use my units then, when there wouldn't be the GvG?Ĭlick to expand.
I can't even exhaust them in GvG aside by fighting itself, I need setting siege armies and defensive armies to exhaust my daily army and then I still will have backup units in stock which usually consists of units of all elder eras. If I have Alcatraz lvl 120, also 2× Timeless Dojo lvl 5, 1× Governor's villa lvl 9, Royal Bathhouse lvl 6 and all unit-producing emissaries, then I can never use all those units during GBG, because fights are quite easy for an autobattle, and when they stop to be, I lose autobattles and I have to stop fighting (I don't fight manually because of time). So GBG isn't so much better than GvG, I think.
GBG is ACTIVELY played by only a few guilds on each server (part of the diamond league), the most guilds do almost nothing in their GBG map and the league system probably wasn't designed for that and for the 90 % guilds which are still staying in bronze league without activity. So why Inno recently improved GvG (finally fixed some bugs, figting became more fluent without delays etc.)? And why Inno hasn't deleted GvG before, i.e. As I know, some players still play FoE almost only for GvG, they would probably end their game (well, there aren't so many of them, but they are). Click to expand.I understand it and I believe it too, but:
0 kommentar(er)
